Indonesia Conference Directory

Corresponding Author
Amalia Syauket

Institutions
Fakulty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya.

Abstract
The Post New Order period of 1999 until 2010 Indonesia had turned into the political system of democracy, on the other hand it still strived against the legacy of the regimes patrimonialism of new order. One of characteristics of the government administration in the period of democracy transition was the emerging phenomenon of shadow state. The shadow of state in Banten was supported by two main pillars, namely Patronage and kinship, which was transformed into official state political administration. Not surprisingly, power centers within the state organizational structure are dominated by political elites who need patronage and kinship relations. So inevitably, shadow states that rely on patronage and kinship are very easy to slip into corrupt practices. The implementation of local government showed that bureaucracy in Indonesia was still cuffed by politics that is still far from excellent. Among the cuff politics suspected of taking hostage of the bureaucracy is the practice of the shadow of the state. The shadow states practiced by the Governor of Ratu Atut Chosiyah in Banten became a model of acute corruption practices in government institutions and state political institution, where corruption practices operate in a structured and organized manner within the local government system. The main purpose in this paper is to explain the shadow state relied on patronage and kinship tend to slip into corrupt practices. Banten led by the Governor Ratu Atut Chosiyah is a perfect example of the shadow state practice.

Keywords
Corruption, Patron client, Shadow state.

Topic
Corruption and Clientelism

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract/8PLEh4JFfjcA

Corresponding Author
Edy Anan

Institutions
Accounting Program Study
University of Amikom Yogyakarta

Abstract
Many parties suspect that there is an in-between relationship of fiscal decentralization and the corruption level in the regencies and city. This study aims to examine the effect of fiscal decentralization on the city-wide corruption level in Indonesia. This study used the General Allocation Fund (Dana Alokasi Umum or DAU) of the regency and city, age of regency and city, and location of regency and city as the control variables. The population of this research is all regencies and cities in Indonesia. As the data sources, we used the secondary data. The research sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. Hypothesis testing uses multiple regression analysis, the coefficient of determination test (R2), and partial test (t-test). The statistical test results of the significance level of fiscal decentralization of the corruption level is 0.016 smaller than the significance level of 0.05 (5%). This result shows that fiscal decentralization has a significant effect on the corruption level of regencies and city in Indonesia. The statistical significance level results for the control variable are regency and city-s DAU of 0.081, age of regency and city of 0.221, and regency and city location of 1.222. This means that the DAU, age, and location of regencies and cities have no significant effect on the corruption level of regencies and cities in Indonesia.

Keywords
Fiscal Decentralization, Corruption Level, Regency and City

Topic
Corruption and Clientelism

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract/YTwtH9dzrpGP

Corresponding Author
KAFURTA SUTAARGA

Institutions
STISIP Setia Budhi Rangkas Bitung

Abstract
This research is to find out the application of Corruption Crimes committed by the Defendant in collecting from the Social Assistance Fund at the Ministry of Education and Culture according to Decision No. 25/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.SRG. This study uses Juridical-Empirical Research method, namely research that uses two ways, namely library research and field research, and data collection techniques used, namely data that has been collected both primary data sources and secondary data sources. The results of this study Defendants were proven to have violated Pasal 2 ayat 1 Jo Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 as amended by Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2001 as amended by Act Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime Jo Pasal 55 ayat 1 ke-1 KUHP is cut/collect social assistance funds from recipients of social assistance on the grounds that there are fees paid to the center and the social assistance funds that are deducted/collected will be distributed again to the central person or the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture who manages the search for social assistance, Technical Guidelines for Distribution of Social Assistance in 2015 in Chapter V concerning Supervision and Complaints in Point B concerning Complaints in the Contents "To Obtain No Social Assistance Funds Charged by Anyone" and Article 4 paragraph 6 Republic of Indonesia Minister of Finance Regulation Number 81/PMK.05/2012 which contains "Social assistance provided by the Social Assistance Giver is not to be taken by the Provider of social assistance. The Defendants act has benefited the Defendant and has caused State Finance losses of 230,354,000 (two hundred thirty million Three hundred fifty four thousand rupiahs) and the Corruption Courts decision at the Serang District Court the defendant was sentenced to 2 (two) years prison is lighter than the prosecutors demands, namely 4 (four) years in prison;

Keywords
Corruption, Collection

Topic
Corruption and Clientelism

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract/QmCzTtP3agd7

Corresponding Author
Tutik Rachmawati

Institutions
a) Parahyangan Catholic University, Ciumbuleuit 94, Bandung, 40141 *tutikr[at]unpar.ac.id
(b) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara Bandung
(c) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Abstract
Public sectors across the globe are seeing a great pressure to innovate. It is however notorious that public sector organizations have deeply embedded culture of risk aversion (Riley, 2019). Compare to the private sector, the culture of risk aversion in public sector is the result of long-standing belief that -failure will not be tolerated- or zero tolerance for trial and error gone wrong (Reester, 2017). Other factors that inhibit public sector innovation are ranged from restrictive regulations, insufficient funding, lagging technology and limited vision by the leaders. On the other hand, transparency and accountability is paramount in public sectors. Prerequisite for this is the upheld ethics by all public sector actors. Therefore, horrifying public responses to failed innovation efforts makes it even harder for public sector to innovate. Working on the use of taxpayer money that needs to be justifiable and expected constantly is not an easy job. Nevertheless, without innovation, it will be almost impossible to fulfill the community needs and expectations. This paper aims at highlighting innovation by Indonesian public sectors particularly at local government level. In doing so, this paper will able to identify the aspect of innovation ecosystem in public sector – what are the significant factors that enable innovation thriving in Indonesian public sector. The second part of the paper will also discuss on how innovation being carried out without contradicting or violating the public ethics. As the result, this paper seek to understand how to strike the balance between ethics and innovation is carried out by public sector actors in Indonesia. Using survey to public officials in Indonesian local governments, the analysis of this paper benefit from rather wide range of public officials in Indonesia. Survey will be done for those local governments with innovation acknowledged by the ministry of administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of Indonesia. The result of the discussion will be recommendation on how to boost the development of innovation ecosystem while being very considerate to the public ethics upheld.

Keywords
Public Ethics, Public Innovation

Topic
Corruption and Clientelism

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract/8GMxemb9ZWcH

Corresponding Author
riya dwi handaka

Institutions
a. Polytechnic Of State Finance STAN, Jalan Bintaro Utama V, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
b. Ministry Of Finance of RI, Jalan Wahidin Raya No.1, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia

Abstract
Since 1999 Indonesia has provided as much autonomy as possible. Regional autonomy is provided together with funding through fund transfers and also flexibility in the budget. Fund transfers from the central government are used by local governments to fund expenditures in accordance with the desired needs. But on the other hand, the provision of authority makes the amount of corruption in Indonesia increase. In this study, it aims to examine the effect of central government fund transfers and expenditure assignments as part of fiscal decentralization on the level of corruption in Indonesia. This study is a quantitative study with analysis using the most unusual multiple linear regression with a fixed effect model. The object of this research is all provinces in Indonesia by taking data from 4 years 2013-2016. The results of this study prove that balancing funds or transferring funds and expenditure assignment which are the measurement of fiscal decentralization in this study have a positive and significant influence on the level of corruption in Indonesia.

Keywords
Transfer Fund; expenditure assignment; fiscal decentralization; level of corruption

Topic
Corruption and Clientelism

Link: https://ifory.id/abstract/GNYZ3kL7txCU